Robert Eisemann v. Victor Herbert, Superintendent, Collins Correctional Facility
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JON 0. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal concerns a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel based on an alleged conflict of interest. The claim, arising out of a bizarre factual context, was the basis for the August 5, 2003, judgment of the District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Jack B. Weinstein, District Judge), granting a petition for a writ of habeas corpus brought by Petitioner-Appellee Robert Eisemann to challenge his New York State sodomy conviction. See Eisemann v. Herbert, 274 F.Supp.2d 283 (E.D.NY.2003). Although the ineffective assistance claim is of arguable…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Burger v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Joseph Stewart v. Hugh WolfenbargerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- Kimbrough v. BradtDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2013
- Tolbert v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
- United States v. Erik DehlingerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.