Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge COHN JUBELIRER.

Before the Court for disposition is a motion for judgment on the pleadings filed by the Department of Corrections (Department). The issue before us involves the crediting of time served where an inmate’s sentences are changed from concurrent to consecutive.

Christopher Harrison, an inmate, has a long and complicated record which, for our purposes, begins on April 20, 1983, when he was sentenced to three concurrent 4-10 year sentences for 1) rape, 2) involuntary *197deviant sexual intercourse and 3) burglary. He was also sentenced on April 20, 1983, to five years…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. IsabellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Newberry Township v. StambaughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. McCray v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. M. Morgalo v. S. Gorniak (SCI Albion Accountant) v. Montgomery County Clerk of CourtsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API