Legal Opinion

Healy v. Fidelity Savings Bank

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

It is undisputed that $1,500 and interest are owing to plaintiffs by the defendants, Clara Feichtner and the estate of Theresa Feichtner, as fhe balance owing on their note for $3,000, secured by a mortgage on real estate given by them to plaintiffs. Plaintiffs claim that when the amount owing on the note had been reduced to $1,500, the makers thereof obtained an additional loan of $500 under an oral agreement between the parties that the mortgage was to- stand as security for also the additional loan. Appellants’ principal contention is that the mortgage originally given to secure the $3,000…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Upton v. National Bank of South ReadingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. Carpenter v. PlaggeIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Hughes v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1881
  4. Loe v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  5. Riess v. Old Kent BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Carley Capital GroupUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1990
  2. Rameker v. Peterson (In Re Associated Enterprises, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API