Legal Opinion

Reed v. Stynchcombe

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 29, 1982No. 38392PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jordan, Chief Justice.

1. This is a habeas corpus proceeding. Code Ann. § 50-127 expressly applies to post-sentence habeas corpus proceedings. Therefore a certificate of probable cause was not a prerequisite for appeal in these pretrial habeas corpus proceedings that were filed by James Reed while he was in custody in lieu of bond pending trial on criminal charges.

The legislative intent to limit the requirement of a certificate of probable cause to appeals in post-sentence habeas corpus proceedings also is expressed by the mention, in the appellate practice provisions, of the “original record…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Greathouse v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. NicholsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  3. Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. Nguyen v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  5. Horton v. WilkesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API