Podoll v. Solem
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Justice.
This is an appeal from a denial of habeas corpus relief. We affirm because the error urged is not of a type cognizable in habeas corpus actions.
Harold Podoll (Podoll) was charged with committing twenty-six sex offenses, primarily or solely with minors, over a three-year period. He initially pleaded not guilty to all twenty-six charges. A plea bargain was next struck whereby Podoll pleaded nolo contendere to three charges of rape in violation of SDCL 22-22-1(5) and the remainder of the charges were dismissed. Podoll later changed his three nolo conten-dere pleas to guilty but…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Goodroad v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Elroy Lynn Wabasha v. Herman Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary and Mark Meierhenry, Attorney General, State of South DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Logan v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. JamesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
3Cited by32 opinions
- McCafferty v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Cowell v. LeapleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Aliberti v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Lodermeier v. ClassSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- St. Cloud v. LeapleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.