Legal Opinion

Podoll v. Solem

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1987No. 15596PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Justice.

This is an appeal from a denial of habeas corpus relief. We affirm because the error urged is not of a type cognizable in habeas corpus actions.

Harold Podoll (Podoll) was charged with committing twenty-six sex offenses, primarily or solely with minors, over a three-year period. He initially pleaded not guilty to all twenty-six charges. A plea bargain was next struck whereby Podoll pleaded nolo contendere to three charges of rape in violation of SDCL 22-22-1(5) and the remainder of the charges were dismissed. Podoll later changed his three nolo conten-dere pleas to guilty but…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goodroad v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Elroy Lynn Wabasha v. Herman Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary and Mark Meierhenry, Attorney General, State of South DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  3. Logan v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State Ex Rel. Smith v. JamesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. McCafferty v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Cowell v. LeapleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Aliberti v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Lodermeier v. ClassSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. St. Cloud v. LeapleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API