Colky v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion
On Rehearing,
2Opinion of the CourtJustice Kiley
This is an action by a beneficiary upon two industrial insurance policies each for $250.00, with verdict and judgment in plaintiff’s favor for $500.00. Defendant has appealed.
The verdict of the jury was:
“We the jury, find for plaintiff with $500.00 damages, plus insurance.”
On motion of the plaintiff the court corrected the verdict to read: “Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00).” Judgment was entered for that sum. The defendant concedes the court has the right to amend the verdict where the intention of the jury is clear, hut says that “the verdict here indicates the jury did not…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Weisguth v. Supreme Tribe of Ben HurIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. SchlinkIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Sommerio v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
- Niemann v. Security Benefit Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
- Mousette v. Monarch Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
4Cited by2 opinions
- Hardie v. AllenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
- Trailmobile v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957