Miller v. Charnes

BABCOCK, Judge.

Plaintiff, Mark Dana Miller, appeals the trial court’s judgment affirming the De*349partment of Revenue’s revocation of his driving privileges pursuant to the implied consent law, § 42-4-1202(3), C.R.S., for refusal to take a sobriety test. We affirm.

I

Plaintiff contends that the hearing officer failed to make sufficient findings of fact to support revocation in that he failed to find specifically that plaintiff had in fact been driving. We disagree.

At the implied consent hearing, the arresting officer testified that on January 18, 1983, he clocked the speed of a Ford pickup with…