State v. Milton
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Zazzali
A jury found defendant, Deshand Milton, guilty of three drug-related offenses. When polled on the second of the three counts, one juror hesitated before responding, “Um guilty. That was the verdict that I gave.” Despite evidence that the juror initially may have said “not guilty,” the trial court accepted the verdict on Count Two as unanimous and denied defendant’s motion for a new trial. The Appellate Division affirmed.
The question presented is whether the trial court abused its discretion when it determined that the juror’s final “guilty” answer to the poll on Count Two indicated clear…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State v. BeySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harold S. McCLINTOCK, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Paula H. Roy v. Star Chopper Company, Inc., and Third-Party v. Ashok Hingorany and Advanced Materials Systems, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- United States v. James McCoyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State of New Jersey v. Quaheem JohnsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
- State v. BoltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2025
- PORTER v. JOHNSONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- State v. MiltonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- Wiseman v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.