Legal Opinion

Eubank v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided March 14, 1939No. Docket No. 86200Published

Petitioner assigned the contingent ritht to receive future commissions on insurance renewal premiums to a trust company in 1924 and 1928. In 1933 commissions were paid to the assignee and respondent taxed petitioner thereon because he was the earner of the income. Held, the assignment was of future compensation for personal services and, since petitioner was the earner of the income, it is taxable to him regardless of the anticipatory assignments.

Read the full summary

Petitioner assigned the contingent ritht to receive future commissions on insurance renewal premiums to a trust company in 1924 and 1928. In 1933 commissions were paid to the assignee and respondent taxed petitioner thereon because he was the earner of the income. Held, the assignment was of future compensation for personal services and, since petitioner was the earner of the income, it is taxable to him regardless of the anticipatory assignments. Lucas v. Earl,281 U.S. 111, and Van Meter v. Commissioner, 61 Fed.(2d) 817, followed.

1Opinion of the Court

GERALD A. EUBANK, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Eubank v. Commissioner

Docket No. 86200.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

39 B.T.A. 583; 1939 BTA LEXIS 1010;

March 14, 1939, Promulgated

Petitioner assigned the contingent ritht to receive future commissions on insurance renewal premiums to a trust company in 1924 and 1928. In 1933 commissions were paid to the assignee and respondent taxed petitioner thereon because he was the earner of the income. Held, the assignment was of future compensation for personal services and, since petitioner was the earner of the income,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Old Colony Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Corliss v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Blair v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Douglas v. WillcutsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API