Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Eaton Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 3, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Carmen Ciparick, J.), entered March 1, 1991, which denied the motion of defendant Warren Stieglitz to renew and reargue his motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s complaint and all cross-claims against him on the ground that they are barred by section 29 of the Workers’ Compensation Law, unanimously modified, without costs, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of granting the motion to renew and, upon renewal, granting so much of the motion as seeks dismissal of the complaint against defendant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Billy v. Consolidated Machine Tool Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Heritage v. Van PattenNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Burlew v. American Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Owens v. HirthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cusano v. StaffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Hill v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1993
- Finkelstein v. ZirinskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994