Legal Opinion
Indianapolis Water Co. v. McCart
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided November 29, 1935No. 1403PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALTZELL, District Judge.
The complainant is an Indiana corporation operating as a public utility and supplying Indianapolis and its citizens with water, having so supplied them for many years. It operates under an indeterminate permit issued by the Public Service Commission, and was so operating during the year 1932.
Early in the year 1932, the Public Service Commission of Indiana (now the Public Service Commission, Acts of 1933, c. 93, p. 663), hereinafter referred to as “the commission,” began an investigation of the value of complainant’s property and the revenue received by it, looking…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McCart v. Indianapolis Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- McCart v. Indianapolis Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United Gas Public Service Co. v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United Gas Public Service Co. v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1938