Legal Opinion

L & A Creative Art Studio, Inc. v. Redevelopment Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 11, 1978No. Appeals, Nos. 2196 C.D. 1976 and 986 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Wilkinson, Jr.,

This is an appeal from an order of the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas which held that appellant had not sustained its burden of proving that one of appellee’s attorneys had the authority to bind appellee to the terms of a stipulation form by signing the form. We affirm.

Appellant occupied premises which were to be condemned by appellee as part of an urban renewal plan. On August 5, 1971, after negotiations had been conducted between appellant and appellee’s Real Estate Department, a stipulation form was drawn up which specified August 2, 1968, as the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. School District v. Framlau Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Philadelphia Redevelopment Authority v. L & A Creative Art Studio, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. Limestone Products & Supply Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. Limestone Products & Supply Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Shelhammer v. Erie Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1995
  4. Whitehall Township v. Rothrock, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API