Legal Opinion

Bumpas v. Sinclair Refining Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 4, 1935No. 4-4020PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, C. J.

To compensate an alleged personal injury, this suit was instituted by appellant against appellees, Sinclair Refining Company and L. H. Bacus, in tbe Jackson Circuit Court. Tbe case was tried to a jury upon the facts adduced by appellant substantially as follows: On June 20, 1934, appellant was in the employ of appellee, L. H. Bacus, and engaged in the business of selling and delivering gasoline, motor oil and other Sinclair products in the trade territory adjacent to Newport, Arkansas. Appellee, Bacus, was the agent of the appellee, Sinclair Refining Company, in that trade territory. Appellee…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mississippi River Fuel Corp. v. SennSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. DooleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  3. Beal-Doyle Dry Goods Co. v. CarrSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  4. Gibson Oil Company v. BushSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  5. Faulkinbury v. ShawSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ragon v. DaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  2. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. BrummettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  3. Sinclair Refining Company v. BumpasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API