Legal Opinion

Hendrix v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 9, 2000No. A99A2359PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Presiding Judge.

Johnny Hendrix challenges his conviction of aggravated battery on the grounds that the State failed to prove venue and that the trial court improperly limited cross-examination. Because we find that venue was established under OCGA § 17-2-2 and that the court did not abuse its discretion regarding the scope of cross-examination, we affirm.

Construed in favor of the verdict, the facts show that Hendrix picked up his ex-girlfriend, Mamie Moore, from her cousin’s home in Chatham County. He told her that her son had been shot, and he offered to drive her to see him. Moore…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Graves v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  3. Minter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  4. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  5. Givens v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Leftwich v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  2. Short v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. Garmon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  4. BIZIMANA v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  5. Narcis Pavlov v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API