Apollo Stationery Co. v. Pilmar
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMorris E. Spector, J.
Motion for reargnment is granted and upon reargnment the original decision is adhered to with the following additional memorandum:
Plaintiff, engaged in the printing and stationery business, seeks to enjoin Pilmar, a former employee, and his associates, from soliciting or doing business with its approximately 500 customers. Plaintiff alleges that Pilmar has illicitly obtained a list of its customers and information concerning its prices and markups and the nature of the items ordered from plaintiff by *266each of the customers involved. On oral argument it was stated that Pilmar had regularly…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Duane Jones Co. v. BurkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Clark Paper & Manufacturing Co. v. StenacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Byrne v. BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- People's Coat, Apron & Towel Supply Co. v. LightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Peerless Pattern Co. v. Pictorial Review Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Apollo Stationery Co. v. PilmarNew York Supreme Court · 1958