Legal Opinion

Apollo Stationery Co. v. Pilmar

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMorris E. Spector, J.

Motion for reargnment is granted and upon reargnment the original decision is adhered to with the following additional memorandum:

Plaintiff, engaged in the printing and stationery business, seeks to enjoin Pilmar, a former employee, and his associates, from soliciting or doing business with its approximately 500 customers. Plaintiff alleges that Pilmar has illicitly obtained a list of its customers and information concerning its prices and markups and the nature of the items ordered from plaintiff by *266each of the customers involved. On oral argument it was stated that Pilmar had regularly…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Duane Jones Co. v. BurkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Clark Paper & Manufacturing Co. v. StenacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Byrne v. BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. People's Coat, Apron & Towel Supply Co. v. LightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  5. Peerless Pattern Co. v. Pictorial Review Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Apollo Stationery Co. v. PilmarNew York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API