Legal Opinion

Boothe v. Dailey

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 8, 1918No. 21,591PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Johnson district court; Jabez O. Rankin, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

Ed Boothe and Maggie Boothe commenced this action to recover the damages sustained by them by reason of the defendant’s deeding to a third party real property which the defendant had contracted to convey to Ed Boothe. Afterward Ed Boothe died. Maggie Boothe, his wife, was appointed his administratrix, and was made a party plaintiff in this action. This is the second time this action has been in this court. (Boothe v. Dailey, 96 Kan. 711, 153 Pac. 551.) In the former opinion, it, was held that, as against a demurrer, the petition stated a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jeffers v. ForbesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. Bell v. KeepersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  3. State ex rel. Lewis v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  4. Read v. LoftusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  5. Witt v. BootheSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stanley v. FarmsSupreme Court of Florida · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API