Haeg v. Haeg
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiffs, Susie Haeg and others, minor children of Charles Haeg, deceased, from an order of the District Court of Hennepin County, Hooker, J., made September 24, 1892, denying their motion for a new trial. On July 17, 1889, Charles Haeg was the owner of about three hundred and forty acres of land in Hennepin county, a lot in Minneapolis, and a quarter section of land in Kandiyohi county.
Read the full summary
Appeal by plaintiffs, Susie Haeg and others, minor children of Charles Haeg, deceased, from an order of the District Court of Hennepin County, Hooker, J., made September 24, 1892, denying their motion for a new trial. On July 17, 1889, Charles Haeg was the owner of about three hundred and forty acres of land in Hennepin county, a lot in Minneapolis, and a quarter section of land in Kandiyohi county. On that day he and his wife executed deeds of all this land, dividing it among his children. The deed to defendant, Fred Haeg, one of his adult sons, purported to convey to him forty acres of the…
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
The plaintiffs and defendants are the widow and children of Charles Haeg, deceased, late of Hennepin county, and his sole heirs at law.
The deceased and the plaintiff Albertina Louisa Haeg, his wife, in his lifetime, and on the. 17th day of July, 1889, executed certain deeds of conveyance of his real property, in separate parcels, to his several children, parties to this action, intending thereby to make a division thereof among them. Among these deeds was one running to the defendant Fred Haeg as grantee of the forty-acre tract'in controversy here. These deeds he intended to have delivered to…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Arnegaard v. ArnegaardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
- Innes v. PotterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Kyle v. KyleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- O'Brien v. O'BrienNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Grilley v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.