Legal Opinion

Bedford v. Riello

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 18, 2008No. A-48 September Term, 2007PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court 1

948 A.2d 1272 (2008)

195 N.J. 210

Carol BEDFORD and H. Paul Bedford, her husband, Plaintiffs-Respondents,

v.

Anthony L. RIELLO, D.C., Peter E. Lowenstein, D.C. and Coastal Chiropractic, Defendants-Appellants.

No. A-48 September Term, 2007

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued March 25, 2008.

Decided June 18, 2008.

Mary Ann Nobile Wilderrotter, Tinton Falls, argued the cause for appellants (Ronan, Tuzzio & Giannone, attorneys; Lauren H. Zalepka, on the briefs).

Danielle S. Chandonnet argued the cause for respondents (Shebell & Shebell, Ocean, attorneys; Thomas F. Shebell, III, of counsel).

John W. Leardi,…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Long; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. Frugis v. BraciglianoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  3. Lewis v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  5. In Re Freshwater Wetlands Protection Act RulesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of EliasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API