Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Nead v. Nolte

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1924No. 18551PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.

This record presents to this court two questions for determination: First, the right of the taxpayer to maintain a proceeding in mandamus-; second, the right of the mayor of the city of Norwood to retain the statutory fees taxed in his favor in state criminal cases. These questions will be discussed in the order named.

The first of these questions has. two branches: (a) Does mandamus lie, or is there an adequate remedy at law? (b) Does the pending suit brought by the city solicitor, which is still pending, abate the suit in mandamus brought by the taxpayer? These questions will also be…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hatch v. SpoffordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852
  2. Kittredge v. RaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Humphries v. DawsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
  4. Mattel v. ConantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  5. Blanchard v. StoneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1844

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Miller v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  2. City of Wapakoneta v. HelplingOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State v. McDowellOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API