Legal Opinion

Murto v. King

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1901No. 4329PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On Removal from Court of Appeals.

1Per curiam

Upon the application of the appellees, made under the statute (Ses. Laws 1899, 172), the court of appeals transferred this cause to the supreme court upon the ground that final jurisdiction was vested in this tribunal. The particular ground upon which the application was based is that a freehold is involved. The appellant now moves to remand the cause to the court of appeals because a freehold is not involved and no other element is present that confers jurdiction.

The record shows that appellant, as plaintiff in the district court, brought the action for the purpose of having canceled an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Scheeren v. StramannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
  2. Cravens v. LeeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hallett v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  2. Callbreath v. HugSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  3. Monte Vista Canal Co. v. Centennial Irrigating Ditch Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Hallett v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  5. Monte Vista Canal Co. v. Centennial Irrigating Ditch Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API