Legal Opinion

Sewer Commissioners v. Sullivan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 2, 1896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action by the sewer commissioners of Amsterdam against Timothy Sullivan and others on a bond for the faithful performance of a contract. There was a judgment in favor of defendants, and plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMerwin, J.

In November, 1888, Sullivan & Co., a firm of which the defendant Sullivan is the survivor, entered into a contract with the plaintiff for the construction of a sewer in the city of Amsterdam. The work was commenced by Sullivan & Co., and continued by them until April 5, 1889, when the plaintiff took possession and completed the work at a loss to the city, as the plaintiff claims, of about $1,300 over and above the contract price. This loss the *359plaintiff in this action seeks to recover of Sullivan and the sureties on a bond given by the contractors for the faithful performance of the contract.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barnes v. . LightNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. New York Building & Improvement Co. v. Springfield Elevator & Pump Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API