State v. Boucher
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
DANA, Justice.
[¶ 1] Steven Boucher appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Aroostook County, Pierson, J.) after a jury verdict finding him guilty of burglary, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 401 (198B), robbery, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 651 (1983), and theft, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 353 (1983). Boucher contends that the court abused its discretion when it decided to join his trial with that of a code-fendant, and he argues that the procedures followed to protect him from the prejudice of his eodefendant’s incriminating statements were ineffective. We conclude that the admission of hearsay statements that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Schneble v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gray v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Delli Paoli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- State of Maine v. Randall DaluzSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
- State v. GuyetteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- State v. ChesnelSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- State of Maine v. Nicholas SextonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.