Legal Opinion
Springer v. Belsom
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 28, 1986No. CA 3726PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESTON H. HUFFT,
Judge Pro Tem.
Defendant appeals from a judgment overruling his exception to the jurisdiction of the Trial Court, urging error because, (1) Article 142 of the Civil Code is unconstitutional; and, (2) jurisdiction was improperly found. For the reasons which follow, we affirm.
On October 29, 1984, plaintiff-appellee filed a petition for separation alleging that: (1) she was domiciled in the Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana, (2) defendant was domiciled in Waveland, Mississippi, (3) the parties were married in New Orleans, Louisiana in May of 1982, and were domiciled in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Slocum v. DeWittLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
- Calix v. SouzaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
- Mason v. MasonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kohnke v. KohnkeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
- Springer v. BelsomSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986