Gordon v. Gordon
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
“ ‘[T]he amount and duration of maintenance is a matter committed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and every case must be determined on its own unique facts’ ” (Giokas v Giokas, 73 AD3d 688, 688 [2010], quoting Wortman v Wortman, 11 AD3d 604, 606 [2004]). The factors to be considered in a *655maintenance award are, among others, the standard of living of the parties, the income and property of the parties, the distribution of property, the duration of the marriage, the health of the parties, the present and future earning capacity of the parties, the ability of the party seeking…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wortman v. WortmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Griggs v. GriggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Baron v. BaronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Giokas v. GiokasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Meccariello v. MeccarielloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sanseri v. SanseriNew York Supreme Court · 2015