Legal Opinion

David v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance Fund

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1994No. 94-129PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber

This is an appeal from a Workers’ Compensation Court decision in favor of the State Fund’s method of calculating benefits for claimant David. We affirm.

We consider the following issues on appeal:

I. Did the Workers’ Compensation Court err in determining the temporary total disability rate to be paid to claimant David?

II. Did the Workers’ Compensation Court properly deny attorney fees?

III. Did the Workers’ Compensation Court properly deny an award of a 20% penalty pursuant to § 39-71-2907, MCA (1991)?

Claimant Curt David (David) was hired by Mike McCoy to do ranch work for a period of one day…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lovell v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. St. John's Lutheran Church v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Dover Ranch v. County of YellowstoneMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Gibson v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Belgrade Education Ass'n v. Belgrade School District No. 44Montana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Robertson v. Aero Power-Vac, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Robertson v. Aero Power-Vac Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API