Legal Opinion

Branigan v. Demarest

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 16, 1932PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wells, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit in the Hudson Circuit of the Supreme Court.

The plaintiff-appellant, Florence Branigan, brought an action against the defendant-respondent, Arthur W. Demarest, to recover damages for personal injuries she sustained in a collision with the defendant’s automobile.

The trial court directed a nonsuit on the ground that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence.

The propriety of this ruling is the only point involved in the ease.

This court has held in Fox v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co., 84…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gentile v. Pub. Service Coordinated TransportNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  2. Hyman v. BiermanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
  3. Castro López v. La Autoridad de TransporteSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1951
  4. Rizio v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
  5. Ellis v. DowdSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API