Sinkey v. Steffens, Exrx.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.
The state of this record is such that it is not necessary to discuss all the defenses, or all the issues. One issue is determinative, viz., the fourth defense in the answer, which alleges: “By way of fourth defense this defendant says that if the said Herman Steffens, during his lifetime, endorsed said note he did so as an endorser only and assumed only the liability of an endorser; that no demand of payment on the maker, The Washington Motor Company, was made at any time and no notice of nonpayment or notice of dishonor ever served on, or given to this defendant or to Herman Steffens during…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Houser v. . FayssouxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Grandison v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- McDonald v. LuckenbachCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909
- Murray v. Third Nat. Bank of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
- Tucker v. MuellerIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cooper v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
- Pacific Nat. Agr. Credit Corporation v. HagermanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935