Legal Opinion

Kansas City Southern Ry. v. Nectaux

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 21, 1928No. 4990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

Appellee brought suit under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (45 USCA §§ 51-59; Comp. St. §'§ 8657-8665) to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from a collision alleged in general terms to have been caused by the failure of appellant, his employer, to furnish him with a safe pls\ee to work. At the close of the evidence both parties moved for a directed verdict. The motion of appellant was denied, and that of appellee was granted, to the extent of fixing liability, and it was left to the jury to find the amount of damages. A verdict for $50,000 was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. North Carolina Railroad v. ZacharySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Railroad Co. v. BarronSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Gila Valley, Globe & Northern Railway Co. v. LyonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Santa Fe Pacific Railroad v. HolmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Bailey v. Louisiana & Northwest R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Southern Ry. Co. v. HusseyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  2. Lawrence Ferran v. Illinois Central Railroad Company and Falstaff Brewing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API