Legal Opinion

County of Yuba v. North American Consolidated Gold Mining Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 3, 1909No. Civ. No. 623PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Yuba County changing ■ the place of trial of a suit in equity. Eugene P. McDaniel, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

This is an action brought to restrain defendants from discharging or depositing tailings and other refuse matter from their mine into Yuba river or certain named branches thereof. A motion was made by the defendants, or some of them, to change the place of trial from Yuba county, and upon hearing the trial court granted the motion, but transferred the case to a county different from that which, in the judgment of both parties, the court was without authority to name. Both plaintiff and defendants appealed from the order. The parties have filed a stipulation that the appeal be taken up at the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rickey Land & Cattle Co. v. GladerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Frances Investment Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Topanga Corp. v. GentileCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API