Legal Opinion

State v. Pettypool

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 15, 1984No. 42007; CA A28754PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The only error assigned on appeal is that defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel. That claim requires an evidentiary hearing and, except in extraordinary cases, may not be raised on direct appeal. State v. Chase, 51 Or App 289, 624 P2d 1100 (1981). Because this is not such a case, the issue must be resolved by habeas corpus proceedings where, as here, defendant has not been convicted of a crime, ORS 138.510(1), but has been found not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect, and the court found that defendant would have been convicted of the crime if she had been found…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. State v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. EnglandWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Mueller v. BenningOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Smith v. JesterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. State v. PettypoolCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. State v. McKargeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API