Legal Opinion

Gregory v. Town of Cambria

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1985Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: As Special Term properly concluded, the action of the Zoning Board of Appeals in granting the area variance was not illegal, arbitrary or an abuse of discretion (see, Matter of Orchard Michael v Falcon, 110 AD2d 1048, affd 65 NY2d 1007). The record demonstrates that because of the peculiar configuration of respondent Carter’s triangular parcel, the application of the parking set-back provisions would prohibit parking on all of Carter’s lot not covered by the building. The adverse impact of this total prohibition of parking on Carter’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fuhst v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Town of Red HookNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Rozler v. FrangerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. Rozler v. FrangerNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. State v. Trustees of the Freeholders & CommonaltyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API