Legal Opinion

United States v. John Hedman, Michael Jercich, Thomas Karnick and Henry Larsen

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 9, 1981No. 81-1128PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge.

Defendants Hedman, Jercich, Karnick and Larsen appeal from the district court’s action denying without a hearing their request for a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence. Defendants are former Chicago building inspection supervisors. In 1978, following a joint trial, a jury found them guilty of violating various federal statutes by extorting money from city building contractors and failing to report the illegal gains on their federal income tax returns. 1 The convictions were upheld on appeal, 630 F.2d 1184 (7th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. United States v. James Vincent KeoghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. United States v. BarrettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. Jeffrey A. BarlowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. Jonathan E. Smith, A/K/A John SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. John Anthony OliverCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. Kamel Kamel and Musa KhabbasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API