Hill v. Chicago City Railway Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Action on the case for personal injuries. Error to the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Jesse Holdom, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1905.
1Opinion of the Court
Me. Presiding Justice Adams
delivered the opinion of the court.
The plaintiff in error was plaintiff and defendant in error defendant in the trial court. The declaration, after averring, in the usual way, that the defendant was the owner of certain tracks, turnouts, etc., in State street between Madison street and Thirty-ninth street, in the city of Chicago, for the purpose of operating cars therein and carrying passengers, avers that it was the duty of the defendant to construct, furnish, maintain and provide, for such purpose, a safe track and safe appliances and machinery; “that contrary to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McNulta v. LockridgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Bartelott v. International BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Chicago City Railway Co. v. RoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Smith v. GillettIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
- Marine Bank v. RushmoreIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.