Legal Opinion
Stokes v. Twin City Motors, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided January 25, 1980No. PB-C-78-146PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HARRIS, District Judge.
On August 31, 1978, plaintiff commenced this action by filing her complaint wherein she alleged that defendants, Twin City Motors and Worthen Bank, violated provisions of the Truth in Lending Act. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1640 and 28 U.S.C. § 1337. Plaintiff seeks to recover actual damages which she is alleged to have incurred by reason of the Truth in Lending violations, and seeks to have the matter certified as a class action for the benefit of all others similarly situated as having borrowed money to finance automobile…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Theresa Plant v. Blazer Financial Services, Inc. Of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cooley v. Wachovia Mortgage Co. (In Re Cooley)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Miller v. Local Mtg. Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Harris v. Moldex-Metric IncDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2022