In re Rossi
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This disciplinary case is before the Supreme Court pursuant to two separate recommendations of the Supreme Court Disciplinary Board (board) that the respondent, Steven M. Rossi, be disciplined for professional misconduct. We note at the outset of this opinion that the respondent was suspended from the practice of law on December 27, 1996, for nonpay*881ment of mandatory dues to the Rhode Island Bar Association, and he departed from the state of Rhode Island in January 1997. However, he remains subject to the disciplinary jurisdiction of this Court.
The board conducted hearings on four…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of HodgeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- In the Matter of BrousseauSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
- Matter of WattSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
4Cited by3 opinions
- Bailey v. Algonquin Gas Transmission Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- Aetna Bridge Co. v. Carrillo, 98-0235 (2001)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2001
- Bailey v. Algonquin Gas Transmission Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002