People v. Harris
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence was properly denied. The defendant did not sustain his burden of showing that he had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the premises searched so as to have standing to challenge the warrantless search (see People v Sanford, 297 AD2d 759 [2002]; People v Rosario, 277 AD2d 943 [2000]; People v Craig, 155 AD2d 550 [1989]).
As the People did not offer identification testimony at the trial from the witness who made a showup identification, the defendant’s contention that the court erred in denying that branch…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. CraigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. PenaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. RosarioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. SanfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Matter of Lavon S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. ColemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019