Legal Opinion

Bettman v. Sporkin

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 1915PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error : Court of Appeals for Hamilton county.

1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.

The action below was brought by Sporkin Brothers & Company, defendants in error in this case, to recover from the plaintiffs in error, Bettman, Cohen & Company, a balance amounting 'to $931.56, claimed to be due on an account.

The original account was for goods sold and delivered by the defendants in error to the plaintiffs in error, and amounted to something like $17,-000, all of which had been paid except the balance claimed. There was attached to the petition an itemized account.

The answer of the defendants was a general denial, after admitting the respective partnerships of plaintiffs and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Ostrander v. ScottIllinois Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hedges v. MuscoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Ramara Inc v. Westfield Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  3. Val Decker Packing Co. v. TreonOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Williams Furniture Corp. v. Arcade Furniture StoreOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Andrew Hofer v. Alan K. Campbell, Chairman, U. S. Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API