Legal Opinion

Stern, Henry & Co. v. McDermott

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1962PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtG-eobge Tilzeb, J.

At the start it must be noted that pursuant to application made on the return day by Louis J. Paley, Esq., the New York County Lawyers’ Association was granted leave to appear amicus curice in support of defendants’ motion for summary judgment.

Pursuant to further request of Hugo E. Rogers, Esq., the Association of the Customs Bar was also granted leave to file a brief amicus curice in support of the motion to dismiss the complaint.

The issue presented in this case is whether customhouse brokers may share in the contingent fees paid to attorneys by importers for legal services rendered in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Union Brokerage Co. v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Matter of Co-Operative Law Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Irwin v. . CurieNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. People Ex Rel. Tower v. State Tax CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. In re New York County Lawyers Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ungar v. Matarazzo Blumberg & Associates, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. People v. MerriweatherNassau County District Court · 1988
  3. Cotto v. MartinezConnecticut Superior Court · 1965
  4. Cotto v. MartinezPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API