Slattery v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Chief Judge.
This case is currently before the court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. This motion is based on three arguments: (1) that this court has no jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ claims; (2) that plaintiffs do not have the requisite standing to bring their claims; and (3) that even if the FDIC discounted Mentor’s goodwill when making its minimum capital calculations, it was within its contractual rights to do so. On March 17, 1995, the court issued an order stating that based upon the court’s decision in Suess v. United…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Loveladies Harbor, Inc. And Loveladies Harbor, Unit D, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Maniere v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Winstar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Suess v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hindes v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- First Hartford Corp. Pension Plan & Trust v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Barron Bancshares, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Barron Bancshares, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Slattery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.