Legal Opinion

Geotas Compania De Vapores, S. A. v. S. S. ARIE H.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 30, 1964No. 341 of 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN DUSEN, District Judge.

This case comes before the court on respondent-cross-libellant’s (hereinafter referred to as cross-libellant) Motion For Entry of Order Under General Admiralty Rules 50 and 38, and Under Local Admiralty Rule 21 (Document 13).

Libellant, Geotas Compañía De Va-pores, S. A. (hereinafter referred to as “libellant” or “Geotas”) acted as managing agent for Transandina Compañía Naviera, S. A., the cross-libellant, for a one-year period during 1961-1962.

On October 24, 1962, Geotas, together with three other libellants, attached the vessel, Arie H., belonging to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Washington-Southern Navigation Co. v. Baltimore & Philadelphia Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Bardach Iron & Steel Co. v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1925
  3. Bertram E. Spriggs, of the Motor Boat Valjean and and Cross-Libellant v. John G. Hoffstot, Jr., Libellant AndCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
  4. Partenreederei Wallschiff v. The PioneerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Titan Navigation, Inc. v. Timsco, Inc., Marine Leasing, Inc. And Rhc Industries, Inc., in Re Marine Leasing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  2. Willamette Transport, Inc. v. CIA. Anonima Venezolana De NavegacionDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API