Esposito v. Quinn
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiffs, John H. Esposito and his excavating company, John H. Esposito Excavating, Inc. (collectively, Esposito), sought compensation for services rendered to improve a parcel of real property owned by the defendants.5 A Superior Court judge allowed the defendants' motion for summary judgment, and Esposito appeals. We affirm.
1. Breach of contract. Esposito claims that Poladian breached the joint venture agreement to develop the property, and that he acted in bad faith. In particular, he claims Poladian breached the joint venture agreement by failing to take further steps to develop the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rae v. Air-Speed, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Salamon v. TerraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Singarella v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Anderson v. Fox Hill Village Homeowners Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Twin Fires Investment, LLC v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.