Legal Opinion

Walker v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

David B. Saxe, J.

Raised here is an issue which appears to have sharply divided both Federal and State courts, namely, whether a plaintiff seeking to recover insurance benefits under the Employees Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 USC § 1001 et seq.) (ERISA) is entitled to a jury trial.

The plaintiff, Mr. Walker, was an employee of defendant Sperry & Hutchinson Co., Inc. (Sperry) for a period in excess of 20 years when he was terminated on November 24, 1984. Subsequent to his termination, Mr. Walker applied for disability benefits under the disability plan (the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Pollock v. CastrovinciDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
  4. Stamps v. Michigan Teamsters Joint Council No. 43District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977
  5. Paladino v. Taxicab Industry Pension FundDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Head v. Central Reserve Life of North America InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Fuller v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API