Legal Opinion

Fite v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided April 5, 2024No. 1:17-cv-00057Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION JOSEPH F.1, Case No. 1:17-cv-57 Plaintiff, Barrett, J. Litkovitz, M.J. vs. COMMISSIONER OF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1). (Doc. 22). The Commissioner filed a response indicating neither support for nor opposition to plaintiff’s motion. (Doc. 24). On January 18, 2024, the Court ordered plaintiff to show cause within ten days why the § 406(b) fee award should not be reduced by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  3. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Rodriquez v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  5. Edna L. HAYES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API