Legal Opinion
Hanvy Ex Rel. Hanvy v. Crosman Arms Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided April 5, 1971PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Humphreys
*264This is an appeal in error from the Circuit Court of Davidson County. The sole question for decision is the correctness of the trial judge in sustaining the defendant's plea in abatement to the jurisdiction of the court.
The parties will be referred to as they were in the court below. The plaintiff, Kendel M. Hanvy, a minor suing by his next friend, is the plaintiff-in-error, and the defendant, Crosman Arms Company, Inc., a New York corporation, the defendant-in-error.
Plaintiff instituted this action by service of process on the Secretary of State. His declaration alleged in substance that,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Gray v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
- Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Nelson v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
- State Ex Rel. Western Seed Production Corp. v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Donaldson v. DonaldsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
- Jasper Aviation, Inc. v. McCollum Aviation, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1972
- Texair Flyers, Inc. v. District Court, First Jud. Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Godwin Aircraft, Inc. v. HoustonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
- Walker v. Kawasaki Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.