Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Foglesong

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 9, 1926Published

1Opinion of the CourtVermilion, J.

The plaintiff’s action is upon a promissory-note executed by the defendant, a copy of which, it was alleged, was set out in the petition. According to the copy so set up, the note was due “on or before April 1, 1924.”

The answer as amended admitted the execution and delivery to plaintiff of a note of like amount on the date of the note, but alleged that the note, when executed, contained an agreement that it was not to become due until what was known as the Anderson farm should be sold by the defendant, and that, after the delivery of the note, it was materially altered by erasing therefrom,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sellers v. DickertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Reed v. RoarkTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Dille v. LongwellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  4. Earnest v. WoodleeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Sieberts v. SpanglerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API