Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Stoffan

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 21, 1974No. Appeal, 388PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Spaeth, J.,

Appellant is a licensed medical doctor. He was indicted on six counts of violating §13(a) (14) of The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, Act of April 14, 1972, P. L. 233, No. 64, 35 P.S. §780-113(a) (14), which prohibits the “prescription by any practitioner otherwise authorized by law so to do of any controlled substance except after a physical or visual examination of the person . . . for whom said drugs are intended, said examination to be made at the time said prescription order is issued ... , or except where the practitioner is satisfied by…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Louisiana Ex Rel. Francis v. ResweberSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Stroud v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McNeilSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. SimmonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. SojournerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. JenningsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Mayhew v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1995

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API