Legal Opinion

Dykes v. Dykes

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 11, 1958No. 20091PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

1. Whenever the evidence demands a verdict for a party who moves for a directed verdict at the close of the evidence, which motion is denied, such party may, within 30 days after reception of the vei’dict, move for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and it is reversible error for the court to refuse to grant such motion. Code (Ann.) § 110-113 (Ga. L. 1953, Nov. Sess., pp. 440, 441; Ga. L. 1957, pp. 224, 236); Baker v. Shockey, 93 Ga. App. 595 (92 S. E. 2d 314).

2. A plea of res judicata alleging former recovery in an adjudication of the same subject matter in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Perry v. McLendonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  2. Glaze v. BogleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Hill v. CoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  4. Baker v. ShockeyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  5. Galloway v. MerrillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Piedmont Cotton Mills, Inc. v. WoelperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  2. Crews v. CrewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  3. Funderburg v. Farr Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API