Legal Opinion

Finch Manufacturing Co. v. Stirling Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 1898No. Appeal, No. 371PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal, No. 371, Jan. T., 1897, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Lackawanna Co., March T\, 1896, No. 420, dismissing exceptions to report of referee. Sheriffs interpleader to determine ownership of certain goods. Before Archbald, P. J. After interpleader filed, agreement of parties to refer to James II. Torrey, Esq., under the act of 1869. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 371, Jan. T., 1897, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Lackawanna Co., March T\, 1896, No. 420, dismissing exceptions to report of referee. Sheriffs interpleader to determine ownership of certain goods. Before Archbald, P. J. After interpleader filed, agreement of parties to refer to James II. Torrey, Esq., under the act of 1869. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. The referee found as a matter of law as follows: 1. The transaction November 27,1895, between the Chamberlain Coal Company and the Finch Manufacturing Company constituted a complete and valid sale of…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb.. Justice Dean,

The issue originally was an interpleader to determine the ownership of an engine and connections, two boilers and a pulley. The property was levied upon as the property of the Chamberlain Coal Company, by a creditor; it was claimed by “The Finch Manufacturing Company;” as the claimant neglected to file bond, by direction of the court the sheriff sold the property for $1,200.08, and brought the money into court to abide its order. Thereupon, the parties interested agreed upon *599the appointment of James H. Torrey, Esq., as referee, to find facts and determine the law.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cowan v. Pennsylvania Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  2. Ashhurst's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  3. Rice's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874
  4. Mueller v. Monongahela Fire Clay Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  5. Russell v. Rock Run Fuel Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. James Clark Co. v. ColtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  2. Mount Union Borough v. KunzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. City National Bank v. Goshen Woolen Mills Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Creighton v. Scranton Lace Curtain Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API