Legal Opinion

State v. Suarez

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 1, 1991No. 8914PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCretella, J.

The defendant appeals from her conviction rendered after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, in violation of General Statutes § 53a-60 (a) (2). The defendant raises several claims including that the trial court improperly permitted testimony concerning statements she had made and improperly allowed testimony that impeached her credibility. She also raises *707issues concerning court instructions and closing arguments of the state. We affirm the decision of the trial court.1

The jury heard conflicting testimony concerning a fight in the women’s bathroom of the Speakeasy Cafe. The two…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  4. State v. PiskorskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  5. State v. GoochSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. YoungConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  2. Giannitti v. City of StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  3. State v. IrvingConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  4. State v. PettwayConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  5. State v. TorresConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API