Legal Opinion

Zarnott v. Timken-Detroit Axle Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1944PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaRLow, J.

Sec. 103.455, Stats., in effect during the period involved in this action, provides as follows:

“No employer shall make any deduction from the wages due or earned by any employee, who is not an independent contractor, for defective or faulty workmanship, unless the employer and a representative designated by the employee shall determine that such defective or faulty work is due to the worker’s negligence, carelessness, or wilful and intentional conduct on the part of such employee. If any such deduction is made or credit taken by any employer, that is not in accordance with this section, the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bolles v. Outing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Commonwealth v. PerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  3. Southern Express Co. v. Commonwealth of VirginiaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  4. Munday v. Wisconsin Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Bossmiller v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. RabeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Kopke v. A. Hartrodt S.R.L.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Wandry v. Bull's Eye Credit UnionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. TappaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. GraysonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API